Assessment 2B: Analysis of teamwork

Order Description
Assessment overview

Assessment 2B asks you to reflect on your experience of working in a team for Assessment 2A to research a topic, develop ideas and publish a Prezi online informational resource. Reflect on the level of success in your team and the role(s) you took within the team assists in enhancing your knowledge and skills for effective teamwork and collaboration. This assignment is designed to help you develop skills in thinking and writing reflectively.
COM10003: Learning and Communicating Online
Assessment 2B: Analysis of teamwork
Word limit: 1000 (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 10%
Due date: 9am AEST Monday 19 September (Week 10)
Print
Assessment overview
Assessment 2B asks you to reflect on your experience of working in a team for Assessment 2A to research a topic, develop ideas and publish a Prezi online informational resource. Reflect on the level of success in your team and the role(s) you took within the team assists in enhancing your knowledge and skills for effective teamwork and collaboration. This assignment is designed to help you develop skills in thinking and writing reflectively.
________________________________________
Assessment details
Think about how your team worked together in preparing the Prezi online informational resource and consider both team process and your completed product.
Specifically, write short answers to each of the following prompts:
1. What rating you would give the team out of 10 (10 being the highest level of success)? What factors do you think contributed to the level of success your team achieved when success is defined as the creation of a resource that has authority and is user friendly and the degree to which you worked effectively as a team? Provide specific examples from your experience to illustrate these factors (approx. 250-300 words).
2. What role(s) did you take within the team and how did you personally contribute to the level of success your team achieved? Provide some specific examples (approx. 250-300 words).
3. Use the literature (unit readings and learning materials) to discuss and explain your experiences, your own role and the success of your team (approx. 250-300 words). You can elect to cover the literature separately or weave the literature into your responses to question 1 and 2 providing you meet the word count requirements.
4. Based on your responses to questions 1, 2 and 3, write about how you will contribute to teams in the future. Describe specific strategies you will implement. (approx. 250-300 words).
Please note: For your responses to 2, 3 and 4, the focus is on you.
Be sure to pay attention to the structure of the response to each question, as correct spelling, grammar and referencing contribute to your marks.
________________________________________
Submission details
Whilst Assessment 2A and Assessment 2B are due on the same day, they should be submitted separately. Please submit your Assessment 2B through Turnitin. More detailed information is available in the Assessment 2B folder in Blackboard.
________________________________________
Assessment criteria
1. Capacity to reflect on what contributed to the team’s level of success and support with relevant examples.
2. Capacity to reflect on your performance as a team member and use of examples.
3. Demonstrated use of the unit readings and learning materials to further explain your experience, your role and the success of your team.
4. Demonstrated capacity to use your experiences from completing 2A to discuss how you will contribute to teams in the future and to describe your strategies.
5. Structure: your ideas are presented in a well-structured and logical order.
6. Appropriate language and expression with attention to correct spelling and grammar.
7. Referencing in Harvard or APA style.
Your work will be assessed using the following marking guide:
Criteria No Pass Pass
50-59% Credit
60-69% Distinction
70-79% High Distinction
80-100%
Capacity to reflect on what contributed to the team’s level of success (20%) Did not meet criterion. You have reflected on what contributed to your team’s level of success and provided some examples from your experiences. You have reflected clearly on what contributed to your team’s level of success and have provided some good examples from your experiences. You have demonstrated insight in your reflection on what contributed to your team’s level of success and have provided very good examples from your experience. You have demonstrated outstanding and insightful reflection and highly effective use of examples from your experience.
Capacity to reflect on your performance (20%) Did not meet criterion. You have reflected on your performance as a team member and provided some examples to support your discussion. You have reflected clearly on your performance as a team member and provided good examples to support your discussion. You have demonstrated insight in your reflection on your performance as a team member and provided very good examples from your experience to support your discussion. You have demonstrated outstanding insight in your reflection on your performance as a team member and provided excellent examples from your experience to support your discussion.
Demonstrated use of the literature (20%) Did not meet criterion. You have used some of the literature to support your reflection You have demonstrated effective use of the literature to support your reflection. You have demonstrated highly effective use of the literature to support your reflection including course readings. You have demonstrated outstanding and highly effective use of the literature to support your reflection including course readings.
Demonstrated capacity to discuss strategies (25%) Did not meet criterion. You have discussed how you will approach future team projects and provided some strategies. You have discussed how you will approach future team projects you have provided clear and thoughtful strategies. You have thoroughly discussed how you will approach future team projects and provided well developed strategies. You have demonstrated an outstanding discussion of how you will approach future team projects and provided excellent strategies.
Structure (5%) Did not meet criterion. The ideas are presented in a logical order however there is room for improvement in structure. The ideas are presented in a reasonably well-structured and logical order. The use of linking sentences and/or topic sentences would help improve cohesion. The ideas are presented in a well-structured and logical order. The ideas are presented in a clear, well-structured and logical order.
Spelling and grammar (5%) Did not meet criterion. There are some spelling errors and/or problems with grammar. The writing is mostly free of spelling errors and/or problems with grammar. There are very few spelling errors or problems with grammar. The work is free from any spelling errors or problems with grammar.
Referencing (5%) Did not meet criterion. Source(s) of information have been acknowledged. There is evidence of an attempt to follow APA or Harvard style for citations and/or references list. The use of citations, and the references list, is mostly accurate for the style (APA or Harvard). You have accurately used citations and provided a references list correct for the style (APA or Harvard).